by Julian Cho
The Mayas will undoubtedly remain a distinct ethnic group for generations
to come, but will continue to press for equality in educational standards,
occupations and social life in order to gain control over their affairs.
They strive to retain the right to find their own identity and develop
their lives as they wish within the framework of the Belizean society.
It is with these in mind that the Mayas are claiming for a Homeland
to preserve their culture, place, freedom and democracy. The idea was born
among the ***Ke'Kchi*** and Mopan Mayas of the Toledo District and developed
by the Toledo Maya Cultural Council and endorsed by the Toledo Alcaldes
Association. The homeland would encompass all the Maya villages and geographical
areas traditionally used by the Mayas. The Mayas argue that since their
ancestors were the original inhabitants of Belize, they have a right by
natural law to inherit the land.
The story of the encounter between the Maya and the British woodcutters
was not peaceful. They Mayas were forced to retreat into the interior to
accommodate logging. The British, in an attempt to subdue the Mayas, created
ten Maya Reservations in the 1880s amounting to about 77,000 acres. The
Reserves were never physically demarcated nor defined in the country's
constitution as the communal property of the Mayas.
Despite the neglect of regional infrastructure by the central government,
the Mayas flourished in these lands by being self-sufficient like their
ancestors thousands of years ago. They planted their corn, beans, fruit
trees and built their houses out of materials from the forest. The Maya
traditional healers treated ailments among the populace. The communal land
system was the norm. Law and order was kept by the Alcalde (village major).
The first two villages to be opened to western civilization, by the introduction
of primary education in the 1940s, were San Antonio and San Pedro Colombia.
The Reservations constructed by the British to subjugate the Mayas were
not honored by the Mayas. Many villages were constructed outside of the
Reservations without the government's approval as the Mayas regard all
of these lands as the home of their forefathers who built magnificent temples
to manifest their presence.
In 1974 the ***Honourable*** Charles Wagner, Minister of Lands in the
Government of Belize (GOB), initiated plans to abolish the Reservation
system and to open the Toledo District to foreign investors. In addition,
the G.O.B. was thinking of reducing the role of the alcaldes.
TMCC prohibited such a move because once the reservation system was
abolished, the Alcaldes would have no role in determining who gets land
in the villages, and law and order would not be respected. The G.O.B. regards
the Reservation System as an anti-development strategy.
TMCC had been willing to accept the abolishment of the Reservation system
on the condition that a Maya Homeland is secured. Only a Homeland would
guarantee equal land distribution for the Mayas. The land lease system
of land ownership is filled with political manipulation. Mayas who applied
for land under this system have been frustrated. Under a Communal Homeland
proposal those who prefer to work the land communally would have that privilege.
The Homeland would accommodate Mayas who want to lease land for milpa,
tourism, or other meaningful development.
It is the philosophy of Mayas that land cannot be bought or sold. The
land is sacred. For example, can we buy air? clouds? rain? sunshine? In
the same way land cannot be sold. Individuals who may want to sell a parcel
of land within the Homeland can only sell it to other Mayas or leave the
land for the benefit of the community.
The Alcaldes and the Land Trust Committee, duly elected democratically
by all village leaders, will decide how land would be distributed in the
Maya Homeland. The Council would stress that the Homeland is developed
and managed by the indigenous occupants for their economic development.
All places considered to be sacred in resources for the community would
not be leased. The Alcaldes and the Maya Land Council would decide which
land or resources would be co-managed by government and Mayas.
The Homeland proposal has the support of all the villages in the Toledo
District. In order to achieve the desires for a Maya Homeland, Curtis ***Berkey***
of the Indian Law Resource Center was asked by the TMCC to do an extensive
research on the historical land rights of the Mayas. The research was in
part completed by attorney at law Ms. Lisa ***Sherman*** [Shuman in Belize
City]. Upon the completion of the land rights document, TMCC held a series
of workshops to educate the local communities.
On April 18, 1996, the Toledo Alcaldes Assocation and the Toledo Maya
Cultural Council, with technical assistance from the Indian Law Resource
Center and the Geography Department of the University of California in
Berkeley began what is called the Maya Mapping Project. This step was taken
to map the area so as to be fully aware of the area's potential for sustainable
development. Maximum benefits would be derived from such developments with
minimal environmental disturbance. The Atlas you have in your hands attests
to the rich culture of the Mayas. It also shows that the attainment of
a Homeland is still not achieved. The Mayas patiently are pursuing peaceful
means to achieve their goal.
The creation of a Homeland under the status of a "Freehold Title" is
the ultimate goal of the Mayas. The production of permanent crops such
as citrus, cocoa, spices, and achote[?] is encouraged. The Maya Trust Committee
would endorse areas to be surveyed for such use through individual or group
effort. This system would give the Mayas time for transition into the "Free
Enterprise" market economy without being exploited but become the direct
beneficiaries.
Existing private properties will be respected. Village land committees
along with the village alcalde would plan the village, parceling the lot
for better management. One hundred acres would be left around the village
to accommodate future expansion and for the poor, the crippled, and the
aged to collect firewood. Streams must be protected from erosion and forest
preserved along the river banks. Forests should not be cleared for plantation,
but may be used for selective logging on small scale providing the community
benefits. Ruins will be preserved and improved for tourists' attraction
by the Village Land Committee.
Community property should be tax-free, but any land parceled out for
individual or group possession should be taxed and payable to the government
of Belize. This is a gesture of working in concurrence with the government
of Belize for the development of our country.
The Mayas are not making an autonomous body, but rather the right to
be consulted about our future. This is a move to guarantee that every Maya
has an inalienable right to a piece of land no matter what his or her financial
status is.
Finally, the Mayas do not want anything extravagant, neither do we want
anything hurtful to the real interests of non-Mayas. We want our rights
determined and recognized. We want a settlement based upon justice. We
want a full opportunity of making a future not only for ourselves but also
for our children. It is in having a small portion of this country and this
world that we call our home that will guarantee that our culture can survive
in the next century. We want this done in such a way that in the future
we shall be able to live and work with all the people as our brothers and
sisters and fellow citizens of this global village.
Transcribed from the handwritten original by Andrew Dean Nystrom,
30 April, 1997.
Top | History
| People and Places | Land
Use | Culture
Village Maps
| Community Services | Tourism
| Outside Problems | Special
Topics
The Making of the MAYA
ATLAS | Group Photos | Links
| Mailbox | Coming
Soon | Coming Soon
Copyright 1998/UCB Geography Department
and the Toledo Maya of Southern Belize
|